Why Constitutional Court Rules Racism Cannot Be Ignored In South Africa

theconstitutionalcourtinjohannesburg

In a judgment handed down by Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng on Tuesday‚ Jacobus Kruger was labelled a racist for using the k-word at work in August 2007.

Kruger‚ who was an anti-smuggling officer at Cape Town International Airport‚ had called his manager Abel Mboweni the k-word.

“I don’t understand how [k-words] think. A [k-word] must not tell me what to do‚” he had said.

ALSO READ  The Unfinished Business Of South Africa's Truth Commission 20 Years After

In a disciplinary hearing Kruger pleaded guilty and was given a final written warning and placed on suspension without pay. But in October 2007 Gordhan reversed this sanction and sacked him.

After Kruger successfully challenged his dismissal at the Commission for Conciliation‚ Mediation and Arbitration and was reinstated‚ SARS approached the Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court.

In both courts SARS argued that Kruger’s reinstatement was intolerable due to the seriousness of his offense‚ but failed in both appeals.

The Constitutional Court has now upheld the taxman’s appeal‚ saying the seriousness of Kruger’s racist remarks cannot be overlooked by the courts in a country still fighting the scourge of racism.

Mogoeng said the use of the k-word had great historical significance in South Africa‚ used previously to deligitimise and dehumanise black people.

“The use of this term captures the heartland of racism‚ it’s contemptuous disregard and calculated dignity-nullifying effects on others.”

He also said Kruger was dishonest when he back tracked on his admission of guilt at the CCMA‚ saying he was advised by his union representatives to plead guilty.

The Constitutional Court ordered that Kruger’s reinstatement be reviewed and set aside‚ but ordered SARS to pay Kruger six months compensation because the organisation had mishandled the dismissal.

You Might Also Like